This obitury was followed by a lot of eulogising messages and adjectives. A lot of liberels and prominent opposition figures did this. Why? What was She?
Please be ready with your defence if you wish to argue with me on the below points.
We need to say good things about the dead and we should lot villify them - What about Nehru, Indira Gandhi, Rajeev Gandhi and 'Chatur Baniya' Gandhiji?
Not close to their demise - What about Pansare, Kalburgi and Gauri Lankesh?
What goes around comes back.
Now about Ms. Swaraj,
1. She was just another Sangh idea follower and propagator. She too believed in Hindu Rashtra.
2. She was close to Advani even during his rath yathra. We all know what it did to the country.
3. She never uttered a word against the twitter abuse on women including Gauri Lankesh, that too immediately after her brutal murder. For those who ask me why her, she ws very vocal when their own troll army attacked her on Twitter. But she was fine when others were given vile abuse and rape threat.
4. Her telling silence on lynchings, and barbaric events like Kathua and Unnao.
5. Her alleged clout with Bellary brothers and Lalit Modi (corruption)
6. For people who hail her immediate response on twitter, well she was a minister when twitter was in prevelance.
7. For people hailing her rescues, was she external affairs minister or SOS minister? India's diplomatic relatioship even with our neighbours deteriorated while she was in office.
8. What was her contribution to India's diplomacy, while in office?
An RSS idolgue in kerala asked after Karunanidhi's demise for people to suggest three good things he did, for him to write an obituary message. I am not going that direction. She did some good work (SOS responses only, that too majorly individual), but that cannot undo the damages she caused, to this beautiful country's secular fabric.
Let us not allow our good manners to paint these people white. Let's call a spade, a spade.
No comments:
Post a Comment